<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VIPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vipo-online.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vipo-online.org</link>
	<description>Virtual Intellectual Property Organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UMG recordings</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/umg-recordings/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/umg-recordings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UMG recordings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[umg recordings inc v veoh networks case no. 10-55732 &#160; UMG recordings inc v veoh networks case no. 10-55732 PDF]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/umg-recordings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megaupload LTD</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/megaupload-ltd/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/megaupload-ltd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megaupload LTD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Megaupload LTD v Universal Music Group, Inc COMPLAINT &#160; Megaupload LTD v Universal Music Group, Inc COMPLAINT PDF]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/megaupload-ltd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DRAMATICO ENTERTAINMENT vs British Sky Broadcasting</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/dramatico-entertainment-vs-british-sky-broadcasting/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/dramatico-entertainment-vs-british-sky-broadcasting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Sky Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DRAMATICO ENTERTAINMENT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Claimants are record companies claiming on their own behalf and in a representative capacity on behalf of the other members of BPI (British Recorded Music Industry) Ltd (“BPI”) and Phonographic Performance Ltd (“PPL”). The Defendants are the six main retail internet service providers (“ISPs”). Between them they have a fixed line market share of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/04/18/dramatico-entertainment-vs-british-sky-broadcasting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toney v L&#8217;Oreal 406 F3d 905</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/toney-v-loreal-406-f3d-905/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/toney-v-loreal-406-f3d-905/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toney v L'Oreal 406 F3d 905]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[June TONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. L&#8217;OREAL USA, INC., The Wella Corporation, and Wella Personal Care of North America, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. Toney v L&#8217;Oreal 406 F3d 905 WORD]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/toney-v-loreal-406-f3d-905/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PENGUIN GROUP USA INC v. AMERICAN BUDDHA</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/penguin-group-usa-inc-v-american-buddha/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/penguin-group-usa-inc-v-american-buddha/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PENGUIN GROUP USA INC v. AMERICAN BUDDHA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The sole issue on appeal is whether there is a basis for personal jurisdiction over American Buddha in New York enabling the district court to decide this dispute. Penguin asserted that the court has such jurisdiction under a provision of New York&#8217;s Long-Arm Statute, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(3)(ii), that allows for jurisdiction over an out-of-state [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/penguin-group-usa-inc-v-american-buddha/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Megaupload v universal</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/megaupload-v-universal/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/megaupload-v-universal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Megaupload v universal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Court can and should deny Megaupload’s unauthorized and unnecessary request for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”) for at least the following reasons Megaupload v universal PDF]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/megaupload-v-universal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hays Recruitment v Mark Ions</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/hays-recruitment-v-mark-ions/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/hays-recruitment-v-mark-ions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hays Recruitment v Mark Ions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Hays Specialist Recruitment (Holdings) Ltd 2. Hays Specialist Recruitment Ltd -and- 1. Mark Ions 2. Exclusive Human Resources Ltd Hays Recruitment v Mark Ions PDF]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/hays-recruitment-v-mark-ions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PETER MURPHY v. MILLENNIUM RADIO GROUP</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/peter-murphy-v-millennium-radio-group/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/peter-murphy-v-millennium-radio-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PETER MURPHY, Appellant, v. MILLENNIUM RADIO GROUP LLC; CRAIG CARTON; RAY ROSSI Case protectability meta data nj PDF]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/peter-murphy-v-millennium-radio-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Copyright Industries PressRelease</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/2011-copyright-industries-pressrelease/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/2011-copyright-industries-pressrelease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Copyrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright Industries PressRelease]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2011 Copyright Industries PressRelease IIPA’S NEW STUDY – COPYRIGHT INDUSTRIES REMAIN ENGINE OF GROWTH FOR U.S. ECONOMY 2011CopyrightIndustriesPressRelease-1 PDF]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/2011-copyright-industries-pressrelease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISP Liability Case C-70 Scarlet Extended</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/isp-liability-case-c-70-scarlet-extended/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/isp-liability-case-c-70-scarlet-extended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP Liability Case]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ISP Liability Case ISP Liability Case C-70 Scarlet Extended]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2012/03/22/isp-liability-case-c-70-scarlet-extended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

