<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VIPO ONLINE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vipo-online.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vipo-online.org</link>
	<description>Virtual Intellectual property Organization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Relevant provisions ISP liability under Ecommerce directive</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/relevant-provisions-isp-liability-under-ecommerce-directive/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/relevant-provisions-isp-liability-under-ecommerce-directive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relevant provisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Relevant provisions ISP  liability under Ecommerce directive; Information society directive; Enforcement directive  Copyright and Information Society Services Directive WORD DOC Ecommerce Directive 2000_31_ec PDF]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/relevant-provisions-isp-liability-under-ecommerce-directive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>List of European cases</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/list-of-european-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/list-of-european-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[List of European cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[List of European cases where party seeks to require ISP to block infringing content doc Other European cases requesting ip based dns blocks WORD DOC]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/list-of-european-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twentieth Century othrs v British Telecommunications</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/twentieth-century-othrs-v-british-telecommunications/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/twentieth-century-othrs-v-british-telecommunications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecommerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twentieth Century othrs v British Telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Evidence adduced at the 20C Fox v Newzbin trial indicated that the Newzbin1 Website had a substantial UK user base. The same appears likely to be the case with the Newzbin2 website. Users are required to pay for membership in pounds sterling, the site uses English as the only language and the site&#8217;s terms and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/15/twentieth-century-othrs-v-british-telecommunications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Film</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/dastar-v-twentieth-century-fox-film/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/dastar-v-twentieth-century-fox-film/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=696</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This case concerned a misrepresentation of origin claim. The Supreme Court found that because photographs are “communicative products” protected by copyright, false designation of their authorship is not cognizable under section 43(a)(1)(A). The Court stated in that case that “ownership of a copyright…is distinct from ownership of any material object in which the work is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/dastar-v-twentieth-century-fox-film/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agence France Press v. Morel</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/agence-france-press-v-morel/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/agence-france-press-v-morel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agence France Press v. Morel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Terms licensing use and distribution of photos uploaded to Twitter by an author to third parties were found to withstand declaratory judgment of non-infringement of an online service providers licensing provisions included in the TOS agreement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/agence-france-press-v-morel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Williams v. Lifes Rad, Cafépress.</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/williams-v-lifes-rad-cafepress/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/williams-v-lifes-rad-cafepress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Williams v. Lifes Rad]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Under the terms of the TOS agreement CaféPress had the authority to remove an item that “CafePress believes…. infringes the rights of a third party, including, without limitation, copyrights [and] trademarks. All claims by the Plaintiff Cafepress shopkeeper, including that the removal of his content from that site violated the Lanham Act, were dismissed. Cafepress.com [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/11/04/williams-v-lifes-rad-cafepress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vocaloid EULA</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/vocaloid-eula/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/vocaloid-eula/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vocaloid EULA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adobe Photoshop, You Tube, Second Life, iTunes , Ebay, Facebook, World of Warcraft, Electronic Frontier Foundations TOSback;  Terms of Service tracker Adobe Photoshop TOS http://www.adobe.com/products/eula/tools/ &#160; You Tube TOS  http://www.youtube.com/t/terms &#160; Second Life TOS http://secondlife.com/corporate/tos.php &#160; iTunes TOS http://www.apple.com/legal/sla/ &#160; Ebay TOS http://pages.ebay.com/help/policies/user-agreement.html &#160; Facebook TOU http://www.facebook.com/terms.php &#160; World of Warcraft EULA http://us.blizzard.com/en-us/company/legal/wow_tou.html &#160; Electronic Frontier Foundations TOSback; Terms of Service tracker [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/vocaloid-eula/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Internet Publication and U.S. Copyright Imperialism</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/internet-publication-and-u-s-copyright-imperialism/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/internet-publication-and-u-s-copyright-imperialism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Publication and U.S. Copyright Imperialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prof. Jane C. Ginsburg, Columbia University School of Law June 28, 2011 “…first disclosure of a work via an off-shore website may make the work accessible all over the world, but it did not follow, either as a matter of U.S. copyright law, or as a matter of Berne Convention policy, that the work thereby [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/internet-publication-and-u-s-copyright-imperialism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Minsky v. Linden Research</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/richard-minsky-v-linden-research/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/richard-minsky-v-linden-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Minsky v. Linden Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Minsky v. Linden Research, 1:08-CV-819; SDNY granted motion to restrain Linden Research from deleting evidence on servers. in order to mitigate damages in the event of loss of data, including that comprising artistic or graphic works, a content creator download and back up a copy of any original virtual work created using the tools [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/richard-minsky-v-linden-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Procd v. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services</title>
		<link>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/procd-v-matthew-zeidenberg-and-silken-mountain-web-services/</link>
		<comments>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/procd-v-matthew-zeidenberg-and-silken-mountain-web-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 08:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procd v. Matthew Zeidenberg and Silken Mountain Web Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vipo-online.org/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In ProCD, the court noted that ‘although Congress possesses power to preempt even the enforcement of contracts about intellectual property&#8212;courts usually read preemption clauses to leave private contracts unaffected….Like the Supreme Court in Wolens, we think it prudent to refrain from adopting a rule that anything with the label “contract” is necessarily outside of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://vipo-online.org/2011/10/26/procd-v-matthew-zeidenberg-and-silken-mountain-web-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

